John Leguizamo Says ‘The Odyssey’ Feels Like an ‘Indie Movie’

SPOILER ALERT: This interview accommodates main spoilers from “The Residence,” now streaming on Netflix.

Earlier than writing a single phrase of Netflix’s newest homicide thriller “The Residence,” creator Paul William Davies knew precisely who the killer and the sufferer can be.

Over the course of eight episodes, the brand new screwball whodunit collection — impressed by Kate Andersen Brower’s non-fiction e book “The Residence: Contained in the Personal World of the White Home” — unraveled the thriller surrounding the demise of White Home Chief Usher A.B. Wynter (Giancarlo Esposito, who took over the position from the late Andre Braugher) on the night time of an Australian state dinner at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

After conducting a whirlwind investigation on the night time of the homicide, throughout which she interviewed 157 suspects and potential witnesses to the crime and its tried cover-up, Detective Cordelia Cupp (Uzo Aduba) returns to the White Home, the place she offers all of her remaining individuals of curiosity a tour of the home whereas explaining the numerous clues she discovered alongside the way in which. The final cease on that tour is the Yellow Oval Room, the place A.B. was killed.

Because it seems, Lilly Schumacher (Molly Griggs), the wealthy, entitled social secretary who had designs of utterly reinventing the White Home, killed A.B., a stickler for custom, on the night time of the state dinner. Shortly earlier than his loss of life, A.B. confronted Lilly in his workplace and threatened to show her for misappropriating funds, illegally securing contracts, buying and selling favors with completely different distributors and sneaking people into the White Home. Within the warmth of the second, Lilly ripped a web page out of A.B.’s meticulously saved journal, which he had used to doc all of her prison exercise.

As soon as she realized that the web page she had might be mistaken for a suicide word, Lilly concocted a plan. She stole paraquat, a poisonous herbicide, from the gardening shed and used certainly one of gardener Emily Mackil’s (Rebecca Subject) dishes to hold the poison into the White Home. She referred to as A.B. from the shed and requested him to fulfill her within the Yellow Oval Room. She additionally impersonated First Gentleman Elliot Morgan (Barrett Foa) so as to get the Secret Service faraway from the second ground. Whereas she secretly blended a deadly cocktail, Lilly noticed A.B. have a disagreement with housekeeper Elsyie Chayle (Julieth Restrepo). (Lilly later even tried to border Elsyie and engineer Bruce Geller (Mel Rodriguez) because the “actual” killers.)

After Elysie was dismissed, Lilly approached A.B. with the poisoned drink as a peace providing. As soon as he realized that the drink had been spiked, A.B. threw it on some close by flowers. Lily then threw a vase at his head, which resulted in perimortem cuts on his face, and bludgeoned him to loss of life with a clock, which she then hid in a storage door within the passageway between the Yellow Oval Room and the Treaty Room. With A.B. gone and the brand new Chief Usher Jasmine Haney (Susan Kelechi Watson) none the wiser about what had occurred that night, Lilly took the ultimate step of sealing that passageway shut, however she didn’t count on Detective Cupp to return and actually put a knife by means of the wall to disclose her cover-up.

A longtime Shondaland writer-producer who reduce his enamel on Shonda Rhimes’ “Scandal” earlier than creating the two-season ABC authorized drama “For the Folks,” Davies moved to Netflix with the corporate and started engaged on “The Residence” greater than 5 years in the past. Beneath, Davies opens up about that killer reveal, how the present overcame the “tragic, devastating” lack of Braugher with the assistance of Esposito, why he selected to solid Kylie Minogue and Al Franken — and why he thinks there are various extra tales to inform with the “World’s Biggest Detective.”

Once you got down to create “The Residence,” you didn’t count on the detective to play a really outstanding position. When you made the choice to heart this present round Cordelia Cupp, how did you consider constructing her as a personality? Why did you select to make her an avid birder?

It’s true that once I first considered this complete homicide thriller thought and began to put it out, I did suppose that it was going to be advised extra by means of the standpoint of the employees and that the detective can be a little bit bit extra on the periphery — like an actual character, however not essentially the guts and soul of it. And even earlier than Uzo got here alongside, simply by way of writing it, I felt Cordelia simply pushing her method in there. One of many issues that I like about this style and nice detective fiction is that you’ve an incredible detective — so I simply embraced that, like, “That is actually Cordelia Cupp’s story.”

I imply, it’s the story of the employees and the folks and all of that. It’s to not diminish any of that in any respect. However on the finish of the day, it is a Cordelia Cupp thriller, and that’s what I like about Sherlock Holmes or Poirot or Benoit Blanc. So I wished her to be iconic that method, and he or she form of wrote herself into it. Uzo is so unbelievable, so magnetic. She has such unbelievable vary, and he or she’s such a life power that she made it all of the extra distinctively Cordelia.

The birding factor was form of natural. My stepdad’s a birder, and I spent quite a lot of time early engaged on the present in my yard the place there’s quite a lot of birds and hen feeders. Although I didn’t actually know something about birds, I used to be watching them and I used to be like, “This might be a enjoyable function of her character,” however I didn’t got down to make it a factor as outstanding because it was for her or for the present. However it simply felt an increasing number of like, “Oh, it is a nice alternative to actually perceive her, how she sees the world and the way in which she thinks.” It simply naturally developed that method to the purpose the place it actually grew to become a vital a part of who she is and the way in which she lives her life. She analogizes to birds on a regular basis. It’s actually core to her id in a method that simply felt proper as I drew her up.

You created so many colourful characters round Cordelia that it was virtually inconceivable for me to determine the killer in actual time, till Cordelia started to spell issues out within the finale. Why did you select to have so many suspects by design?

I feel it’s twofold. One is that the entire undertaking was born out of studying this e book and simply studying concerning the employees. And though it went in a completely completely different route and there’s no homicide thriller within the e book, I used to be interested in it and wished to maintain figuring it out, as a result of I assumed there have been so many nice tales and relationships among the many employees and between the employees and the president. I reduce characters out at numerous factors. As many as there have been, I had extra! It grew to become even tougher once I began casting, after which I wished to write down extra for all of those unbelievable actors. I ended up having to do much less with a few of the employees members who weren’t essentially suspects, however that I wished you to know extra, and it simply was inconceivable at a sure level. However I wished it to really feel as wealthy a world and as distinct a world as potential, and that’s born out of the characters. That was actually vital to me.

And by way of the suspects of all of it, I like these all-star solid homicide mysteries from the ’70s — “The Final of Sheila,” “Homicide on the Orient Specific,” “Loss of life on the Nile,” after which extra not too long ago, “Clue,” however then particularly “Knives Out.” I feel that’s all the time been the enjoyable a part of the style, simply even the “Knives Out” poster with all people there — it’s nice! God bless Rian Johnson for doing that, and resuscitating that complete style. And going again to Agatha Christie and having as many individuals as you possibly can in that room when you may have a summation — that, to me, is pleasant.

There’s clearly all types of various methods to inform a homicide thriller and have detective fiction. “Sleuth” was a very vital film, I feel, for Rian Johnson and actually impactful on me, in addition to “Loss of life Entice” with Christopher Reeve and Michael Caine within the early ’80s. These are two-, three-person motion pictures. However I wished this to really feel as huge as potential with as many distinctive characters as potential.

How did you discover the tone of the present, and the way did you’re employed on it along with your leads and the remainder of your very massive ensemble?

The tone of it’s form of simply me, so in that sense, I didn’t need to determine it out apart from get all people on board. Shondaland and I’ve an incredible relationship. I’ve been right here for over a decade, they usually know who I’m, how I like to write down and the tone of issues that I like. Not that this is similar as different issues precisely, however I feel it’s multi-tonal within the sense that it’s very comedic, but in addition there’s a romance in it, there’s some actual emotion to it. So it’s not only a laborious comedy, but it surely’s additionally clearly not a drama with a few jokes. That’s simply the way in which that I write issues, and I don’t actually ever simply do one factor in a selected method. I like with the ability to have quite a lot of completely different tones that add as much as, I suppose, who I’m.

I’d written 4 or 5 – 6 scripts earlier than we actually began casting. The tone may be very a lot within the scripts themselves too. In case you learn certainly one of these scripts that I wrote, there’s quite a lot of stage route, quite a lot of jokes. You may get a way of who I’m and what the present goes to be from studying these scripts greater than possibly another scripts. I feel the individuals who learn it, responded to it and wished to do it knew what it was, after which I fed off that vitality too. We understood one another. So it wasn’t like we ever actually needed to sit down and have the discussions of, “Oh, you already know what? It’s actually like this.” All of them have nice comedic expertise, however in addition they can play it straight and do issues in the way in which that the present was designed. So there have been no laborious conversations. Everyone was on board with it from the get-go.

At what level throughout the writing course of do you know that Lilly Schumacher was the killer? Why did you decide on her?

After I set all of it up, it actually was ensuring that I had recognized the precise particular person — each the killer and the sufferer. I actually wanted to establish anyone who might be the sufferer, who may engender quite a lot of hostility, motive, and have that be plausible and sustainable over a lot of completely different people. I knew I wished to do a giant spectacle like a state dinner, however I didn’t need it simply to be that the one people who have been potential suspects have been folks within the employees or folks attending the dinner. I wished it to be as large a spread of oldsters as potential, so I wanted to determine who that particular person was — after which, on the similar time, the precise killer.

I wished the central battle to symbolize one thing that was actual to the Home. I didn’t need it to be like there was some outside-the-house dispute about cash, or an affair, or one thing that would have simply been wherever however simply occurred to be on the White Home. I wished the battle to be rooted within the Home. There may be this rigidity generally between the extra everlasting employees after which the people who are available in and are like, “Hey, we’re going to redo this, or give it some thought this fashion.” They typically and do work collectively on a regular basis. I imply, we haven’t had anyone get killed in these positions. However I appreciated the concept this rigidity that does exist is one thing that would encourage this relationship on either side.

However have been there any particular clues that you just included within the present to later reveal that Lilly was the killer? Had been there any clear tells that you just and Molly Griggs had mentioned forward of time?

You’ll be able to see all the way in which alongside that she has these disputes with A.B., and in contrast to different characters the place they’re extra targeted on a selected episode, her disputes form of exist virtually in each episode, which, to me, was enjoyable. Once you return, you’re like, “Oh, Episode 2 is essentially about Marvella. 3 is Didier. 4 is Sheila. 5 is Tripp.” However in each a type of episodes, weaving your method by means of, you study, “Oh, she was in a struggle with him concerning the musical visitor. Oh, she was in a struggle with him concerning the seating cost.” So it’s form of all all through, and if you happen to watch that, you’re like, “Oh yeah, she’s consistently having points with him about this night time and earlier than this night time.” In order that was structurally actually vital to me.

Molly’s good, and I feel she gave us a lot. I needed to calibrate all the things on the finish to verify I wasn’t revealing an excessive amount of or too little. She’s such an unbelievable actress that she gave us choices to have the ability to play with the efficiency. Inside this vary, she delivered this unbelievable, indelible — to me — iconic villain efficiency once you understand who she is on the finish. But in addition, as nice actors do, with sufficient vary in how she does it in order that I may “true” all of it up on the finish and make it possible for it wasn’t too huge on this route or too buried or no matter. In order that was on me to try this on the very finish — not simply together with her, however with all people. It’s virtually like an eight-hour film in a way, so you need to make it possible for 90 minutes into it or three hours into it, you’re not pushing too far on this route or that route.

I did make a degree of this complete notion that A.B. all the time had his fights with folks behind closed doorways, and I reference that repeatedly. You see him try this on a regular basis in order that when Lilly does say in Episode 7, “Oh, I noticed him preventing with anyone within the Yellow Oval Room.” It’s very nuanced, however that’s not plausible as a result of we really, actually noticed the door closed in that scene. But in addition, it isn’t in line with the way in which he did issues for probably the most half. So there have been issues like that each one the way in which alongside that I wished to make that logic obvious to the viewer, as a result of that was one thing Cupp was selecting up on as she was working by means of the case.

You misplaced Andre Braugher midway by means of manufacturing, and also you selected to recast his position with Giancarlo Esposito, who had labored with Braugher on “Murder: Life on the Road” and was a longtime pal of his from the New York theater scene. How have been their portrayals of A.B. completely different? Did the position need to get any smaller or change in any respect to accommodate the recasting?

The position itself didn’t change. I didn’t rewrite something. I didn’t write it for Andre at first, and I didn’t rewrite it for Giancarlo. The position was the position. I feel it’s a sworn statement to the brilliance of these two actors that it’s virtually like a play, within the sense that completely different folks are available in and play the identical character, they usually play it in their very own good, distinctive method — and that’s what they did. So I didn’t want to write down to both of them. They’re simply unbelievable actors. I imply, clearly, [it was] a really unlucky circumstance — tragic, devastating for all of us. So it’s not like a play in that sense in any respect the place you simply have a unique actor coming in. This was born out of a complete devastation to all of us on a really private stage, and their performances are very distinctively their very own.

Technically, it was difficult, as a result of we had shot stuff with Andre, so we clearly needed to reshoot sure issues. We had to determine different issues that have been difficult, however that was the least of the problem. The problem was emotional for all of us, as a result of he was such a core a part of this household, and all of us beloved him and he beloved the present. We have been fortunate sufficient to have the grace and brilliance of Giancarlo to return in and deal with in a method that I feel made it simpler for all of us.

The administrators of “The Residence” ended up utilizing “plates” — background photographs that are then superimposed with different parts throughout post-production — so that you have been primarily in a position to superimpose pictures of Esposito over Braugher in some episodes. How a lot have been you in a position to reshoot with Esposito, provided that A.B. is generally in scenes with larger teams of individuals?

We reshot any form of substantive efficiency. There have been bigger scenes on the state dinner and stuff the place it could’ve been extremely difficult to duplicate all these issues that A.B. was in, and we may technically do it with “plates.” So we have been in a position to make these issues work, however we reshot any scenes with him that he was speaking or performing in any substantive method. I imply, all people’s in a scene for a purpose, however in some circumstances, it was simpler to have the ability to [use “plates”] — as an alternative of replicating that full scene — than to attempt to reshoot one thing huge the place the core of the scene was about one thing else [other than A.B.]. So these issues we made work wherever we may.

Have you ever or Shondaland ever thought-about releasing clips of what Braugher did shoot in these 4 episodes earlier than he handed?

We by no means talked about that.

You determined to set this present throughout the hustle and bustle of an Australian state dinner on the White Home. You bought Kylie Minogue to play a model of herself in a pair episodes, after which there are quite a few references to Hugh Jackman, though we by no means see his face. How did Minogue’s cameo come about? How shut did you really get to getting Jackman, and why did you select to make use of a physique double of him when he couldn’t do it?

I wrote Hugh in once I wrote the primary episode and saved it going, with the hopes that possibly there was an opportunity with the schedule, that it could work out. I don’t know him, I’ve by no means labored with him, however I’ve solely heard nice issues about him. There have been folks on the present that had labored with him on numerous issues — folks at Netflix — and my sense was very clear that if the schedule would’ve labored out, he would’ve been completely recreation for it, but it surely didn’t. And I assumed, “Nicely, it’ll be enjoyable [anyway].” I feel it’s simply a part of the humor of the present, so we left it in, and I assumed that was a enjoyable method to do it.

Kylie’s extremely busy, and it simply labored out that she was in a position to do it, and he or she was completely pleasant. And never solely did she do it, however she did much more than initially anticipated as a result of, once more, scheduling issues labored out and he or she was so recreation. I wished to make use of her nevertheless I may as a result of she’s so enjoyable, so we received to perform a little bit greater than I had initially even deliberate for that.

What about Al Franken? The previous real-life senator, who resigned in 2018 beneath a cloud of sexual misconduct allegations, performs a fictional senator on this present.

Al was the identical form of factor. That was all the time going to be form of a extra conventional position within the present, within the sense that it wasn’t identical to a day or two or no matter. It was going to be an even bigger half all over. However I didn’t know that I might be capable to use him as a lot as I did. He was actually completely happy to do it, so undoubtedly as soon as I had Al Franken, I used as a lot Al Franken as I may. He’s a legend and he did an incredible job, and I feel folks actually loved working with him on these scenes.

The truth that this present is titled “The Residence” signifies that you possibly can theoretically set the following chapter of this story in one other well-known residence, in nearly any nation. Have you considered what a second season may seem like?

I haven’t had quite a lot of time to have the ability to give it some thought, however I’ve considered it alongside the way in which, for positive. Even in its inception, as soon as I actually considered Cordelia and Cordelia and [Randall Park’s] Edwin, it’s all the time lurking there. I’ve undoubtedly thought that there are different locations that we are able to go, and mysteries that would really feel completely distinctive but possibly acquainted within the sense of how they work. I feel a part of the enjoyable of quite a lot of nice detective fiction is that every one is completely different, however there’s a familiarity to the way in which they work. There’s 221B Baker Road; there’s Poirot — each in his type and the way in which he approaches issues. How the circumstances come to him may be very distinctive, but in addition acquainted each time. That’s a part of the consolation of an incredible thriller and nice detective fiction. So I feel I might wish to proceed to construct on the way in which that we did this, however with its personal twist and its personal journey, wherever that may be. I’ve concepts!

This interview has been edited and condensed.